PCR tests are not a valid diagnostic tool

Post Reply
User avatar
Trucker Joe
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:24 am

PCR tests are not a valid diagnostic tool

Post by Trucker Joe »

It is just one more of the 8 hundred trillion lies told daily by the MSM

https://youtu.be/NGlEljlg2v4
User avatar
Perry Mason
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:45 pm

Re: PCR tests are not a valid diagnostic tool

Post by Perry Mason »

The truth about PCR Tests

https://youtu.be/EWNkJUDctdk
User avatar
Vette guy
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:31 am

Why PCR tests are total bullshit

Post by Vette guy »

User avatar
RAM1500
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:06 pm

Nanofiber Swabs, Rick Grimes And Your Right To Be Informed

Post by RAM1500 »

https://www.encouragingangels.org/new-b ... mmlmkd101g

Ladies and gentlemen I present to you (the not so humble) ‘Ultra-absorptive Nanofiber Swabs for Improved Collection and Test Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 and other Biological Specimens(https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/ ... si_001.pdf)’.

Some might naively think that the swab used in the RT-PCR test is just a long cotton swab, like some sort of specialized ‘Q-Tip’®️ designed for a nasopharyngeal application. When I read the research article mentioned above about the swab (and did some homework) it appears that nothing could be further from the truth. Let’s take a look at some of the ingredients of this supposed means of specimen collection.

How was the PCL prepared for ‘the study’? ‘Fabrication of PCL nanofiber mats. PCL nanofiber mats were generated via electrospinning, following our previous studies.1–5 PCL pellets (10% w/v) and Pluronic F-127 (0.5% w/v) were dissolved in a 4:1 (v/v) DCM:DMF solution. The resulting PCL/F-127 solution was electrospun at 16 ml/h at 25C, 55% RH, and under 32 kV applied voltage using an LE-100 electrospinning machine with a circular 20 emitter array equipped with 21 gauge needles (such that each needle had a flow rate of 0.8 ml/h). The nanofibers were collected on a high-speed drum collector until an approximately 1 mm thick mat was obtained.

So the swab that is composed of nanofiber mats that were dissolved in a DCM:DMF solution where DCM and DMF both carry significant warnings regarding human contact from the EPA are in contact with one of the most sensitive and receptive places in your body, the nasopharyngeal upper respiratory location deep in the nasal cavity. Kind of gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling, doesn’t it (ok, time to turn off the sarcasm)? Or does it give you ‘effects on the liver and digestive disturbances’?

Read the whole article. The test is worse than the disease.
User avatar
Bot
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2021 9:10 pm

Re: PCR tests are not a valid diagnostic tool

Post by Bot »

https://banthis.tv/watch?id=60a8280ab72e4b4268fa84ba

Kary Mullis exposed many of Fauci's lies. One day he mysteriously died. Welcome to politics in the USA.
Post Reply